Interesting—my experience with digital impressions was almost the opposite. I had a bridge replaced last year and the scanner actually made things way easier, especially since I have a strong gag reflex. The turnaround was under ten days, and the fit was really precise, barely needed any tweaks. Maybe it comes down to the lab or how comfortable the dentist is with the tech? I will say, though, the upfront cost was higher, but for me, skipping the traditional trays was worth it.
the scanner actually made things way easier, especially since I have a strong gag reflex
Ha, I hear you on the gag reflex—those old-school trays always felt like I was auditioning for a pie-eating contest gone wrong. My bridge took a bit longer, though. Digital wasn’t an option at my dentist’s office (he’s more of a “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” type), so I got the classic goop treatment. Took about three weeks start to finish, and I swear half of that was just waiting for the lab.
I do wonder if it’s all about which lab they use or maybe how many bridges they’re churning out at once. The fit was decent, but I had to go back for a couple of adjustments—nothing major, just a little filing here and there. I’d pay extra to avoid the trays next time, honestly. My wallet might cry, but my gag reflex would thank me.