Chatbot Avatar

AI Chatbot

Ask me anything about the Dental Patient Forum!

v1.0.0
Notifications
Clear all

How long did your bridge replacement actually take?

118 Posts
114 Users
0 Reactions
1,210 Views
Posts: 4
(@climber516770)
New Member
Joined:

Yeah, I totally get where you’re coming from. When I had my bridge done, my dentist actually tried the digital scan first, but then switched to the traditional mold because my bite was “complicated.” I was a little disappointed since I’d read about how fast digital can be, but in the end, the fit was spot on. Insurance was honestly the bigger headache—mine took nearly six weeks just for approval, and I had to keep calling to check on it. The tech is cool, but if insurance is still stuck in the stone age, it kind of defeats the purpose.


Reply
Posts: 23
(@stormfisher608)
Eminent Member
Joined:

The tech is cool, but if insurance is still stuck in the stone age, it kind of defeats the purpose.

That’s exactly what frustrated me too. My daughter needed a bridge after an accident, and our dentist raved about the digital scanner—she was actually excited about it. But insurance held things up for almost a month and a half, just for pre-authorization. By the time we got the green light, her scan needed to be redone anyway. I honestly wonder if insurance companies are ever going to catch up with the technology side. The process itself only took two appointments, but waiting on paperwork felt endless.


Reply
leadership_kevin
Posts: 48
(@leadership_kevin)
Eminent Member
Joined:

Insurance dragging things out is honestly the part that wears people down the most. I totally get where you’re coming from—my dad needed a bridge after losing a tooth from a biking accident, and it was like the tech was lightyears ahead of the paperwork. The dentist had this 3D scanner and was able to get a perfect fit for him in minutes, but then we just sat around waiting for insurance to “review” the case. It took almost six weeks. By then, the original scan wasn’t even accurate anymore because his gums had shifted a bit, so we had to redo everything. He was so frustrated, and honestly, I don’t blame him.

The actual dental work was quick—two appointments, just like you said. He was in and out, no pain, and the bridge felt natural right away. But the waiting made everything feel ten times longer than it needed to be. It’s wild to me that we can get digital impressions and same-day crowns in some cases, but insurance still acts like everything has to be faxed over and reviewed by a committee from the last century.

I wish insurance companies would realize how much unnecessary stress they’re causing. Dental tech is moving forward, but if the systems around it don’t catch up, it’s like running in place. Sometimes I wonder if they’re just hoping people will give up or pay out of pocket instead of waiting. Maybe that’s a little cynical, but it’s hard not to feel that way after dealing with all the delays.

Anyway, my dad’s bridge has held up great, but that whole experience left us both pretty annoyed. Tech should make things easier, not just for dentists, but for patients too. If only the rest of the process could move as fast as those digital scanners...


Reply
Page 24 / 24
Share:
Scroll to Top